ScoreCardConfigs/租赁公司信用评级方法与模型/主体-金融租赁-RankTable.json

202 lines
6.8 KiB
JSON
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

{
"得分级别标准": {
"AAA": 90,
"AA+": 86.67,
"AA": 83.34,
"AA-": 80,
"A+": 76.68,
"A": 73.35,
"A-": 70,
"BBB+": 66.67,
"BBB": 63.34,
"BBB-": 60,
"BB+": 56.67,
"BB": 53.34,
"BB-": 50,
"B": 40,
"CCC": 30,
"CC": 20,
"C": 10
},
"档位得分标准": {
"第一档": 1,
"第二档": 5,
"第三档": 11,
"第四档": 17,
"第五档": 23,
"第六档": 29,
"第七档": 33,
"第八档": 37
},
"指标及权重": [
{
"指标": "业务竞争力",
"指标类型": "定性指标",
"一级指标": "业务状况",
"二级指标": "业务竞争力",
"档位": {
"第一档": "业务竞争力非常强",
"第二档": "业务竞争力很强",
"第三档": "业务竞争力强",
"第四档": "业务竞争力较强",
"第五档": "业务竞争力一般",
"第六档": "业务竞争力较弱",
"第七档": "业务竞争力弱",
"第八档": "业务竞争力很弱"
},
"权重": 20
},
{
"指标": "客户质量及融资租赁集中度",
"指标类型": "定性指标",
"一级指标": "业务状况",
"二级指标": "客户质量及融资租赁集中度",
"档位": {
"第一档": "表现非常好",
"第二档": "表现很好",
"第三档": "表现好",
"第四档": "表现较好",
"第五档": "表现一般",
"第六档": "表现较差",
"第七档": "表现差",
"第八档": "表现很差"
},
"权重": 15
},
{
"指标": "实收资本(亿元)",
"指标类型": "定量指标",
"一级指标": "资本与盈利性",
"二级指标": "实收资本(亿元)",
"档位": {
"第一档": "[50,+inf)",
"第二档": "[35,50)",
"第三档": "[25,35)",
"第四档": "[15,25)",
"第五档": "[10,15)",
"第六档": "[7,10)",
"第七档": "[4,7)",
"第八档": "[0,4)"
},
"权重": 10
},
{
"指标": "平均资本回报率(%",
"指标类型": "定量指标",
"一级指标": "资本与盈利性",
"二级指标": "平均资本回报率(%",
"档位": {
"第一档": "[15,+inf)",
"第二档": "[10,15)",
"第三档": "[8,10)",
"第四档": "[6,8)",
"第五档": "[4,6)",
"第六档": "[3,4)",
"第七档": "[2,3)",
"第八档": "[0,2)"
},
"权重": 10
},
{
"指标": "租赁资产不良率(%",
"指标类型": "定量指标",
"一级指标": "资产质量",
"二级指标": "租赁资产不良率(%",
"档位": {
"第一档": "[0,1)",
"第二档": "[1,1.5)",
"第三档": "[1.5,2.5)",
"第四档": "[2.5,3)",
"第五档": "[3,3.5)",
"第六档": "[3.5,4)",
"第七档": "[4,4.5)",
"第八档": "[4.5,100]"
},
"权重": 10
},
{
"指标": "拨备覆盖率(%",
"指标类型": "定量指标",
"一级指标": "资产质量",
"二级指标": "拨备覆盖率(%",
"档位": {
"第一档": "[400,+inf)",
"第二档": "[300,400)",
"第三档": "[200,300)",
"第四档": "[120,200)",
"第五档": "[100,120)",
"第六档": "[80,100)",
"第七档": "[60,80)",
"第八档": "[0,60)"
},
"权重": 10
},
{
"指标": "流动性比率(%",
"指标类型": "定量指标",
"一级指标": "抗风险能力",
"二级指标": "流动性比率(%",
"档位": {
"第一档": "[7,100]",
"第二档": "[5,7)",
"第三档": "[3,5)",
"第四档": "[2.5,3)",
"第五档": "[2,2.5)",
"第六档": "[1.5,2)",
"第七档": "[1,1.5)",
"第八档": "[0,1)"
},
"权重": 10
},
{
"指标": "资本充足率(%",
"指标类型": "定量指标",
"一级指标": "抗风险能力",
"二级指标": "资本充足率(%",
"档位": {
"第一档": "[15,+inf)",
"第二档": "[13,15)",
"第三档": "[12,13)",
"第四档": "[11,12)",
"第五档": "[10,11)",
"第六档": "[9,10)",
"第七档": "[8,9)",
"第八档": "[0,8)"
},
"权重": 15
}
],
"评级调整": [
{
"调整因素": "风险管理水平",
"简介": "租赁公司的风险管理水平对其业务发展和经营业绩起着决定性作用。风险管理架构是否合理决定了风险管理的独立性,风险管理体系的有效性需要技术做支撑进行定期评估,因此风险管理体系是由多方面因素构成并形成一个有机的整体。租赁公司管理层的风险管理意识、风险管理架构和体系、风险管理独立性和有效性等方面会影响受评租赁公司的信用状况。"
},
{
"调整因素": "财务报告与信息披露质量",
"简介": "信用评级依赖于经审计的财务报表的准确性,而财务报表的质量可能会受内部控制的影响。财务报告与信息披露质量较差也会影响受评租赁公司的信用状况。"
},
{
"调整因素": "环境、社会与公司治理ESG",
"简介": "环境、社会与公司治理ESG风险因素会对租赁公司的信用质量会产生实质性影响。若租赁公司在公司治理等方面存在明显缺陷将会影响受评租赁公司的信用状况。"
},
{
"调整因素": "重大事件",
"简介": "意外重大事件也可能造成企业基本面短期内急剧恶化,从而影响企业的信用状况。重大事件范围广泛,包括但不限于监管变化、资本重组、并购、资产出售、分拆、诉讼、地缘政治冲突、重大网络犯罪事件等。"
},
{
"调整因素": "历史信用记录",
"简介": "远东资信会关注企业的历史信用记录,并据此调整企业的信用级别。一般而言,历史信用记录较差的企业按时还本付息的意愿相对较弱,相应的违约风险较大。"
},
{
"调整因素": "预期调整因素",
"简介": "如果预计受评租赁公司未来会发生重大变化且这一变化是可持续的,可以考虑使用预测的业务和财务数据对企业进行评级打分,并对信用级别进行调整"
},
{
"调整因素": "其他调整因素",
"简介": "对于其他调整因素(包括但不限于:行业竞争格局的重大意外变化、监管处罚或其他不利因素等),远东资信将视具体情况予以评估"
}
],
"外部支持": {
"类型": "股东"
}
}